Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) frequency of occurrence (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: frequency of occurrence


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CH_corpusRLAtxt4 - : Similarly in an analysis of child language acquisition, Gierut & Morrisette note that like adults, children not only "have knowledge of the phonological properties of language, but also how these properties are distributed, in terms of frequency of occurrence and phonotactic structure, across words of the ambient language" (1998: 264 ). The effects of this knowledge might be evidenced in the labial variation under investigation here, or, in terms of phone frequency, in linguistic experiments. In speech error research, Levitt & Healy (1985), for example, find that in slips-of-the-tongue, the tendency is also for a low frequency phoneme to be replaced with a high frequency phoneme. This bias towards frequent sounds and patterns is true not only in production, but in perception, as well. For example, Newman, Sawusch & Luce state that "listeners may be biased toward labeling ambiguous stimuli as more common phonemes" (2000: 300). Patterns revealed in these and other experiments are similar to

2
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt264 - : As is seen in [104]Table 2, the two groups bear several important resemblances. First, the percentages in the frequency of occurrence for each of the three categories are somewhat similar: Irish subjects, for instance, mitigate compliments 47% of the time while Mexicans mitigate them 38% of the time . Irish subjects accept compliments 41% and Mexicans 43% of the time. The last category, rejecting, is used by Irish participants with a frequency of 12% while that figure for the Mexicans is 18% However, there are important differences. The frequency of the use of a single strategy in the Mexican corpus is 17% lower than the frequency of the use of single strategy in the Irish data (39%). Secondly, the order of preference the subjects reported is different in each group: Irish subjects are found to most favor mitigating, followed by accepting, with rejecting as the least favored category of strategies, while Mexicans prefer accepting overall, followed by mitigating and rejecting.

Evaluando al candidato frequency of occurrence:


1) irish: 5
2) subjects: 4
3) mexicans: 4

frequency of occurrence
Lengua: eng
Frec: 26
Docs: 18
Nombre propio: / 26 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.835 = ( + (1+3.8073549220576) / (1+4.75488750216347)));
Candidato aceptado

No se encontraron referencias bibliográficas sociadas al/ alos término(s)

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)